I don’t believe in chain mail unless it’s part of a political action.Â In this case one of the worst companies in New York State is trying to monopolize the wine and spirits market through a referendum on the docket March 9th that they are hoping slips through the cracks.Â If passed, they will essentially destroy every small business importer in the state,vastly limiting your options for great wine.Â The following is an e-mail circulated to me from three of my favorite companies, Michael Skurnik, IPO, and T.Edwards.
Â A critical issue to the very existence of the fine wine industry in New York has been brought to our attention and we wanted to make you aware of it.Â One of the largest liquor wholesalers is lobbying the State Senate to include an â€œat restâ€ provision in their 2012 budget. The practical effect of â€œat restâ€ means that only those distributors delivering product out of New York warehouses could legally sell you wine. Legislation such as this would affect essentially every wholesaler currently in operation other than the two biggest ones, since they almost all warehouse in New Jersey, including our company.
Imagine a landscape with only the two largest wholesalers remaining to work with. Selections would become painfully limited. Prices would most certainly rise.Â Service would plummet. Their pro-â€œat restâ€ argument (union warehouse jobs and revenue) is simply a veiled attempt by this wholesaler to destroy all of the fine wine wholesale competition, because most of your valued New York wholesalers would undoubtedly be forced to close their doors. We have contacted our State Senators to tell them that we oppose â€œat restâ€ in either legislation or budget language. We urge you to do the same before FRIDAY, MARCH 9th. Please contact your Senator to tell them you oppose â€œat rest.â€Â The procedure is quick and simple.Â Please just click on the link: http://www.nysenate.gov/senators. Type in your address and zip code under â€œFIND MY SENATORâ€ and hit submit. Fill out the online form with your information (ignoring the drop down box), type â€œAt Restâ€ in the Subject Line and either craft your own statement or feel free to copy and paste the paragraph below. We thank you for your time, your attention, and most of all your support.
It has come to our attention that one large wine & spirit wholesaler is lobbying you to include â€œat restâ€ in the 2012 budget. They are claiming â€œat restâ€Â will create revenue for the State. But, as a licensed, small business that buys from many wine distributors, I do not agree that it would create revenue. Instead, I believe that â€œAt restâ€Â would result in hundreds of closed businesses, including both wholesalers and retailers, and at least a thousand unemployed New Yorkers.Â As such the State would lose hundreds of millions in taxable revenues from passing this bill. The volume of wine sold in the State (and the accompanying beverage excise tax revenue) would severely decrease.Â Consumer selection would be limited and the price of wine wouldÂ escalate with the costs inevitably passed on to the consumer. Moreover, the ancillary effects of the resultant higher unemployment, lower sales and income tax revenues collected, would further exacerbate the current economic position of the state, not improve it.Â With the above in mind,Â we urge you NOT to vote for â€œat restâ€ either in legislation or in the budget language.
Â I have done business with these two companies in the past.Â It was like dealing with the mafia.Â Every wine lover should voice against this proposal.